fbpx
published on June 4, 2019 - 2:21 PM
Written by

 (AP) — Democrats ignored a White House veto threat on Tuesday and muscled legislation toward House passage that would give a chance for citizenship to an estimated 2 million-plus migrants, a bill that stands virtually no chance of enactment but lets them showcase their efforts on one of their highest-profile priorities.

The measure is just one skirmish in Democrats’ multi-front battle against President Donald Trump and most congressional Republicans over immigration, an issue that has deadlocked the two parties for decades. It is likely fated to join a host of other House-passed measures advancing Democrats’ agenda that are running aground in the GOP-run Senate, including legislation on health care, gun control, climate change and election security.

As if to underscore the relentlessness and sweep of the immigration fight, the Democratic-led House Appropriations Committee took its own swipe at Trump by unveiling a separate bill that provides no additional money next year for building the president’s long-sought barriers along the southwest border. That measure also claws back a portion of the billions of dollars Trump has unilaterally diverted toward constructing portions of his wall.

The bill the full House debated would protect from deportation and provide a pathway toward citizenship for young migrants brought to the U.S. illegally as children. Many of those beneficiaries would be “Dreamers” currently protected by the Obama-era Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, or DACA, which only the federal courts have prevented Trump from dismantling.

It would also shield others here temporarily because their home countries — chiefly in Central America, Africa and the Middle East — have been ravaged by wars or natural disasters.

The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated that more than 2 million people already in the U.S. would get legal status under the House bill. The analysts also said the measure would cost more than $30 billion over the next decade, largely because many of the migrants attaining legal status would qualify for federal benefits like Medicaid.

Democrats said that besides humanitarian considerations, helping the migrants stay in the U.S. would benefit the economy and the many industries that employ them as workers. Among the bill’s supporters are the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the AFL-CIO labor organization, as well as immigration and liberal groups.

“This is about who we are as Americans, and what is in the best interests of our country,” said Rep. Lucille Roybal-Allard, D-Calif., the measure’s chief sponsor.

Republicans criticized the bill for lacking border security provisions that they and Trump have long demanded as part of any major immigration bill, and said it’s overly generous provisions would encourage even more illegal immigration.

“No doubt at this very minute, the smuggling cartels are getting the word out: Congress is going to legalize millions,” said Rep. Doug Collins, R-Ga.
White House aides sent lawmakers a letter threatening a Trump veto, saying the measure “would incentivize and reward illegal immigration” without “protecting our communities and defending our borders.”

The debate occurred as the number of migrants arriving at the border with Mexico has swelled, straining the government’s ability to process and detain them. Since Dec. 1, more than 200,000 migrant families have been released into the country, with a huge backlog of cases meaning they will likely be in the U.S. for years until immigration courts decide their fate.

Trump has requested $4.5 billion to address that influx, but Congress has yet to approve it. Trump, for whom harsh language and policies toward immigrants has been a trademark, has also proposed imposing a 5% tariff on all Mexican goods starting next week if that country doesn’t stem the flow of migrants and drugs into the U.S. The assessment would grow gradually to 25% without a resolution.

Under the House bill, “Dreamers” and immigrants brought to this country illegally at a young age could qualify for a decade of conditional legal status if they were age 17 or less when they arrived and have been in the U.S. continually for at least four years. They’d have to meet specific education and background check requirements, and not have committed felonies or certain misdemeanors, including for domestic violence.

They would qualify for full, permanent legal residence if they attain post-secondary degrees, serve in the military or have worked for at least three years. After waiting another five years, they could then apply for citizenship.

Also qualifying for legal residence, and possible citizenship, would be people in the U.S. with Temporary Protected Status, another program that temporarily protects roughly 300,000 people from 10 war-torn or disaster-racked nations. The administration has tried ending the program for people from several of those countries — including Sudan, Nicaragua, Haiti and El Salvador — but has been hindered by several lawsuits.

Several thousand Liberians fleeing violence and the Ebola virus who’ve won temporary legal status in the U.S. would also be given a chance for permanent residence and citizenship. Trump decided last year to end that program, called Deferred Enforced Departure, but in March extended it for another year so the program could be phased out.

Democrats’ separate homeland security spending bill would cancel $601 million from procurement programs, dinging Trump for trying to shift that amount from a Treasury fund toward building a border wall, and cut the number of Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention beds. That move by Democrats seeks to reduce the government’s ability to detain migrants instead of releasing them pending court appearances.

Both proposals seem certain to attract another Trump veto promise.
___
AP reporter Andrew Taylor contributed.


e-Newsletter Signup

Our weekly poll

Who is most responsible for fixing the homelessness problem in California?

Loading ... Loading ...

Central Valley Biz Blogs

shares