The Business Journal editorial board has come out in support of Measure C. I’d like to share the editorial we recently published explaining our stance:

When Fresno County residents get their Nov. 8 ballot in the coming weeks, they will consider several measures that would raise their taxes, depending on where they live.

As gas prices soar once again and inflation lingers, these decisions have real-world consequences. Voters must consider what expenses make sense in this uncertain economy. They must also consider the value they receive for the additional burden they accept.

When it comes to Measure C, the half-cent sales tax devoted to Fresno County’s transportation needs, we believe the choice is clear. Measure C deserves an extension from voters. Since 1986, Fresno County voters have recognized the benefits of Measure C, which delivered more than $1 billion in improvements to state highways, county roads and city streets in its first 20 years. That sort of commitment leverages matching transportation dollars by a factor of two or three times. That’s the kind of investment we need more of from the state and federal government.

Measure C is a trusted mechanism that has helped deliver or jumpstart projects that make life easier and safer for Fresno County commuters. Examples include Fresno’s Veterans Boulevard, the Highway 180 extension, Highway 41 extension, Blackstone and McKinley avenues grade separations in Fresno, Friant Road north of Fresno and the State Route 269 Bridge near Huron.

The newest extension of Measure C will continue to deliver such impactful projects, but will also address essential maintenance including repairing potholes, repaving roads, upgrading declining bridges, relieving traffic congestion and funding public transportation. Most importantly — a vote for Measure C will not raise the taxes of Fresno County voters.

The current version of Measure C expires in June 2027, so some might question, “why not wait a little bit longer to bring it before voters?” Henry R. Perea, former Fresno County Supervisor and Measure C proponent, answered that question in a recent meeting with The Business Journal editorial board. With everything going up in price right now, including interest rates, it’s better to lock in prices now. With Measure C winning approval from voters, municipalities can begin issuing bonds for their projects — at more attractive rates.

Despite 81% of county residents supporting Measure C, some controversy has arisen about the extension. Some opponents are attempting to thread the needle, saying in one breath that they support Measure C — just not the way the money would be distributed — and also asking voters to reject Measure C. With nearly 40 years of momentum behind it, to reject Measure C now would be a major blow to our transportation system. Another criticism is that Measure C equates to a “slush fund,” with elected officials getting too much local discretion over how to spend the money. But isn’t that why we elect representatives? To make decisions on our behalf? If we don’t like those decisions, we give them the boot.

Whether you drive a car or take public transportation, Measure C has undoubtedly touched your life. And it will continue to give us safer roads and highways in the future if voters do the right thing and approve Measure C.