(AP) — U.S. Rep. Jeff Fortenberry learned in 2018 that he received $30,000 in illegal campaign donations from a Nigerian-born billionaire, but the Nebraska Republican lied and misled federal investigators probing the exchange of illicit dollars, a prosecutor alleged Thursday.

During opening statements at the nine-term congressman’s federal trial at a Los Angeles courthouse, a defense attorney presented a starkly different version of events. Attorney Glen Summers argued that the only scheme was engineered by federal authorities out to “ambush” Fortenberry and “get him,” after an extensive national investigation of foreign donations involving members of Congress fell flat.

What prosecutors allege “is not what happened,” Summers told the jury of eight women and four men. The federal case amounts to a “failed memory test,” not illegal activities.

The congressman, who is running for reelection, has pleaded not guilty to charges he deliberately misled FBI agents and prosecutors who were investigating the 2016 donations at an L.A. fundraiser from businessman Gilbert Chagoury, who is of Lebanese descent.

Prosecutors allege Fortenberry, 61, lied about what he knew on two occasions — an interview at his Lincoln home and a follow-up meeting in Washington — and didn’t properly disclose the contribution in his campaign filings.

Fortenberry listened intently from the defense table in front of U.S. District Court Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr., with family members seated in the courtroom, including a 7-month old grandchild napping in a stroller.

Prosecutor J. Jamari Buxton told the jury the case comes down to choices and Fortenberry, while given numerous opportunities to confirm the illegal donations and report them, instead went down “an illegal path” of lies and concealment.

Those choices, Buxton said, were motivated by the congressman’s need to protect himself, his career and the money funding his campaign.

The prosecution’s case is anchored in what Fortenberry said — or didn’t say — during the two interviews with federal investigators, along with a secretly recorded 2018 phone call with an informant cooperating with investigators — a Los Angeles-based doctor — who told the congressman about the alleged scheme to funnel money to his campaign and that Chagoury was probably the source of the $30,000 he received in 2016.

Summers sketched a portrait of a hardworking congressman and devout Catholic from a modest background who willingly cooperated with investigators, then found himself a target. His biggest mistake, Summers said, was meeting with agents who later “set him up.”

While prosecutors depicted a shady world of cash payments and furtive dealings, Fortenberry never saw any cash and believed the donations were reported properly to government regulators, Summers said.

Allegations that he was told about the illegal donations in the recorded 2018 call were based on a cellphone conversation in which it’s not known if Fortenberry heard what was said at the time, if he understood it, or even later forgot it, Summers said.

He urged the jury to consider those “reasonable possibilities.”
If he’s convicted, Fortenberry wouldn’t automatically lose his seat, but House rules would bar him from voting in any committee or on the floor. He has already stepped down temporarily from his position as the ranking member of the House Agriculture Appropriations Subcommittee and a member of the House Appropriations Committee, as required by House Republican rules.

With the trial underway, many prominent Nebraska Republicans have abandoned the incumbent in favor of a young, conservative state lawmaker who wants to oust Fortenberry in the May 10 primary.